Monthly Archives: January 2012

Microsoft App-V vs VMWare ThinApp

Only looking at core differences that caught my eye:

ThinApp (now – as of latest version 4.7) does not support native x64 applications. It does support x86 applications running on x64 platform through WoW64. Source – (vendor has done a lot of homework hiding this, it’s very easy to miss) – Official User Guide, Certain operating systems and applications are not supported by ThinApp.

ThinApp integrates a licensing date stamp inside each package. BEFORE the license runs out, you have to update each application package and re-roll it to your clients. Source – 1, 2.

Virtualizing applications results in SLOWER performance (responsiveness, launch times , read – think about the real impact on user experience!) and quotes from a superb study by Login Consultants Application Virtualization Impact on VDI:

“Conclusion on Microsoft App-V: When App-V is fully pre-cached, Winword starts 20% slower compared to locally installed application.”

“Conclusion on VMware ThinApp: The initial launch of Winword using ThinApp streamed is around 40% slower than locally installed.

“Conclusion: App-V and ThinApp are between 140% and 170% slower compared to local when it comes to this communication with the local system.”

From my personal experience – multiple customers failed to adapt a working VDI environments because the end-user feedback during a pilot is “Slow, slow, slow”.

 

App-V does not support virtualizing IE (a valid points for customers looking for IE6 compatibility solution).

 

Some extras – A common misconception is that Application Virtualization helps you solve Application Compatibility issues on Windows Vista/7/8 – it does not. It helps you solve Application Interoperability and Conflicts.